<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1519 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer for verification of the date of handing over of the seized material. If confirmed that the material was handed over in F.Y 2010-11, the assessment for A.Y 2004-05 would be invalid. The Tribunal did not address the remaining grounds of appeal due to the core issue being remanded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:21:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1519 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer for verification of the date of handing over of the seized material. If confirmed that the material was handed over in F.Y 2010-11, the assessment for A.Y 2004-05 would be invalid. The Tribunal did not address the remaining grounds of appeal due to the core issue being remanded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>