https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291589 A certificate under the Public Demands Recovery Act is void where no public demand existed when it was issued, so the ordinary civil court jurisdiction was not excluded. Entries in the Record-of-Rights were not conclusive against the plaintiffs on tenancy and possession where the factual findings rebutted them, including the absence of any lawful settlement to them as patnidars. Refund of sums paid under protest was recoverable as money had and received, but only within the applicable three-year limitation period; the payment made on 28 October 1920 was time-barred. en-us Tue, 14 Aug 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:04:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291589 A certificate under the Public Demands Recovery Act is void where no public demand existed when it was issued, so the ordinary civil court jurisdiction was not excluded. Entries in the Record-of-Rights were not conclusive against the plaintiffs on tenancy and possession where the factual findings rebutted them, including the absence of any lawful settlement to them as patnidars. Refund of sums paid under protest was recoverable as money had and received, but only within the applicable three-year limitation period; the payment made on 28 October 1920 was time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Aug 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291589