<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 48 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23795</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the remuneration paid to the spouse for services rendered was not assessable in the hands of the assessee under section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that formal qualifications were not necessary as long as the individual possessed relevant expertise and experience in the profession. The court held that the payment was for the husband&#039;s professional experience utilized by the firm, and each party would bear their own costs in the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:06:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 48 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23795</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the remuneration paid to the spouse for services rendered was not assessable in the hands of the assessee under section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that formal qualifications were not necessary as long as the individual possessed relevant expertise and experience in the profession. The court held that the payment was for the husband&#039;s professional experience utilized by the firm, and each party would bear their own costs in the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>