<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 524 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400769</link>
    <description>A writ petition concerning refund of IGST paid on exported goods was disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider the refund request reflected in the shipping bills and decide it within the stipulated time. The Court did not determine the refund entitlement on merits; it confined relief to consideration of the application by the Department. The operative effect was a time-bound direction for administrative decision on the export refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 524 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400769</link>
      <description>A writ petition concerning refund of IGST paid on exported goods was disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider the refund request reflected in the shipping bills and decide it within the stipulated time. The Court did not determine the refund entitlement on merits; it confined relief to consideration of the application by the Department. The operative effect was a time-bound direction for administrative decision on the export refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>