<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 325 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291580</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals in part, affirming the eligibility of investment allowance and additional depreciation while upholding the disallowance of extra shift allowance. The ITAT held that the computers qualified as plant and machinery, entitling the assessee to investment allowance and additional depreciation. The decision emphasized that the data processing and printouts constituted tangible products, supporting the assessee&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:38:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 325 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291580</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals in part, affirming the eligibility of investment allowance and additional depreciation while upholding the disallowance of extra shift allowance. The ITAT held that the computers qualified as plant and machinery, entitling the assessee to investment allowance and additional depreciation. The decision emphasized that the data processing and printouts constituted tangible products, supporting the assessee&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>