<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 509 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400754</link>
    <description>The Court directed the respondent authorities to decide on the petitioner&#039;s refund application promptly, considering the alternative prayers presented. The Court emphasized timely decision-making within four weeks and instructed compliance with applicable laws and policies. The Court did not assess the merits of the claim but provided clear directives for addressing the refund application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:15:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 509 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400754</link>
      <description>The Court directed the respondent authorities to decide on the petitioner&#039;s refund application promptly, considering the alternative prayers presented. The Court emphasized timely decision-making within four weeks and instructed compliance with applicable laws and policies. The Court did not assess the merits of the claim but provided clear directives for addressing the refund application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>