https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400741 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the first respondent was not liable to pay rent arrears already settled with the second respondent. The petitioner was advised to resolve any issues with the second respondent through legal channels. The judgment underscored the significance of upholding contractual obligations and lease agreement clauses, concluding the case without imposing any costs and resolving the dispute over rent arrears. en-us Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:31:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400741 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the first respondent was not liable to pay rent arrears already settled with the second respondent. The petitioner was advised to resolve any issues with the second respondent through legal channels. The judgment underscored the significance of upholding contractual obligations and lease agreement clauses, concluding the case without imposing any costs and resolving the dispute over rent arrears. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400741