<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 493 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,26,84,602/-, classifying the seized document as a &quot;dumb document.&quot; The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s addition lacked material evidence, was based on presumptions, and the document did not meet the criteria to levy a tax charge. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:31:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 493 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,26,84,602/-, classifying the seized document as a &quot;dumb document.&quot; The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s addition lacked material evidence, was based on presumptions, and the document did not meet the criteria to levy a tax charge. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>