<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 763 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291550</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against the order of acquittal in a case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court acquitted the accused, citing conflicting interpretations of whether the cheque amount should be considered before or after deducting payments made towards the liability. The appeal was referred to a Division Bench for resolution due to the legal conflict, with the matter subsequently forwarded to the Chief Justice for further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:11:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 763 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291550</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against the order of acquittal in a case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court acquitted the accused, citing conflicting interpretations of whether the cheque amount should be considered before or after deducting payments made towards the liability. The appeal was referred to a Division Bench for resolution due to the legal conflict, with the matter subsequently forwarded to the Chief Justice for further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>