<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court finds petitioner was given opportunity to be heard before compulsory audit u/s 142(2A) was ordered.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55525</link>
    <description>Compulsory audit u/s 142(2A) - Though the impugned action is questioned on the ground that effective opportunity of hearing was not given. However, the record reveals that before taking decision a notice was issued and petitioner was given the opportunity of hearing. Facts nullify the contention of the petitioner that they had no effective opportunity of hearing.- HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:20:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:20:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court finds petitioner was given opportunity to be heard before compulsory audit u/s 142(2A) was ordered.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55525</link>
      <description>Compulsory audit u/s 142(2A) - Though the impugned action is questioned on the ground that effective opportunity of hearing was not given. However, the record reveals that before taking decision a notice was issued and petitioner was given the opportunity of hearing. Facts nullify the contention of the petitioner that they had no effective opportunity of hearing.- HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:20:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>