<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 480 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the disallowance under Section 40A(3) and the addition of unsecured loans under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision highlighted the significance of business expediency, genuine transactions, and the requirement for corroborative evidence when applying these sections. The judgment was delivered on 11/11/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:20:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 480 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the disallowance under Section 40A(3) and the addition of unsecured loans under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision highlighted the significance of business expediency, genuine transactions, and the requirement for corroborative evidence when applying these sections. The judgment was delivered on 11/11/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>