https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400707 The HC quashed the summoning order dated 28.11.2016, the complaint in CC No. 6573/2017 under Sections 138/141/142 of the NIA, and all subsequent proceedings, including the order dated 04.12.2019. The petitioner, having resigned as CEO before the cheque issuance, was not liable due to the absence of specific allegations establishing vicarious liability. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400707 The HC quashed the summoning order dated 28.11.2016, the complaint in CC No. 6573/2017 under Sections 138/141/142 of the NIA, and all subsequent proceedings, including the order dated 04.12.2019. The petitioner, having resigned as CEO before the cheque issuance, was not liable due to the absence of specific allegations establishing vicarious liability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400707