<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 457 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400702</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals for AY 2011-12 and fully allowed them for AY 2014-15. It directed the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 79,60,882/- for AY 2011-12, as the purchases were found to be genuine based on primary documents submitted by the assessee. The decision was applied to AY 2014-15 with variations in figures and supplier names. The Tribunal emphasized the principles of natural justice and the lack of independent investigation by the AO in confirming the addition on account of alleged bogus purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 21:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 457 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400702</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals for AY 2011-12 and fully allowed them for AY 2014-15. It directed the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 79,60,882/- for AY 2011-12, as the purchases were found to be genuine based on primary documents submitted by the assessee. The decision was applied to AY 2014-15 with variations in figures and supplier names. The Tribunal emphasized the principles of natural justice and the lack of independent investigation by the AO in confirming the addition on account of alleged bogus purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>