<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 450 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 was invalid as it was initiated after four years without new material evidence. The appellant had fully disclosed all relevant information during the original assessment, and the reassessment was deemed impermissible as it was based on a change of opinion. Therefore, the reassessment proceedings were quashed, and the appeal was decided in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 09:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 450 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 was invalid as it was initiated after four years without new material evidence. The appellant had fully disclosed all relevant information during the original assessment, and the reassessment was deemed impermissible as it was based on a change of opinion. Therefore, the reassessment proceedings were quashed, and the appeal was decided in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>