<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 447 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to delete the addition of Rs. 4,83,50,000/- to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, thereby refuting the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also acknowledged procedural delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, justifying the extended timeline for issuing the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 447 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to delete the addition of Rs. 4,83,50,000/- to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, thereby refuting the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also acknowledged procedural delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, justifying the extended timeline for issuing the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>