<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 438 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400683</link>
    <description>A bail condition requiring deposit of 35% of the fine amount for suspension of sentence was treated as unduly harsh because appellate conditions under Section 389 CrPC must remain reasonable and not effectively defeat release on bail. The Court applied the settled principle that fine- or compensation-linked terms should bear a rational relationship to the accused&#039;s circumstances and capacity, and should not impair personal liberty by imposing an excessive burden. The deposit requirement was therefore modified to 10% of the fine amount, while the remaining bail conditions were left unchanged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 438 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400683</link>
      <description>A bail condition requiring deposit of 35% of the fine amount for suspension of sentence was treated as unduly harsh because appellate conditions under Section 389 CrPC must remain reasonable and not effectively defeat release on bail. The Court applied the settled principle that fine- or compensation-linked terms should bear a rational relationship to the accused&#039;s circumstances and capacity, and should not impair personal liberty by imposing an excessive burden. The deposit requirement was therefore modified to 10% of the fine amount, while the remaining bail conditions were left unchanged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>