<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 56 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23771</link>
    <description>The High Court of BOMBAY ruled in favor of the assessee, a pharmaceutical manufacturer, allowing the deduction of share issue expenses as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1970-71. Despite the expenses being related to issuing fresh equity capital, the Court agreed with the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that there was a direct nexus between the expenditure and income earning. The Court emphasized the businessman&#039;s viewpoint and business necessity in determining the nature of expenditure, ultimately supporting the assessee&#039;s claim and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument against allowing capital expenditure as a deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 56 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23771</link>
      <description>The High Court of BOMBAY ruled in favor of the assessee, a pharmaceutical manufacturer, allowing the deduction of share issue expenses as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1970-71. Despite the expenses being related to issuing fresh equity capital, the Court agreed with the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that there was a direct nexus between the expenditure and income earning. The Court emphasized the businessman&#039;s viewpoint and business necessity in determining the nature of expenditure, ultimately supporting the assessee&#039;s claim and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument against allowing capital expenditure as a deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>