<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Denies Cheque Ink Age Test; Accused Still Can Defend Against Presumption in Favor of Complainant.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55503</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - merely because the accused application seeking expert&#039;s opinion regarding the age of the ink is rejected, that itself would not take away the defence of the accused in its entirety. However, the accused would be still at liberty to put forth his defence to rebut the presumption, if any, formed in favour of the complainant. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:44:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Denies Cheque Ink Age Test; Accused Still Can Defend Against Presumption in Favor of Complainant.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55503</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - merely because the accused application seeking expert&#039;s opinion regarding the age of the ink is rejected, that itself would not take away the defence of the accused in its entirety. However, the accused would be still at liberty to put forth his defence to rebut the presumption, if any, formed in favour of the complainant. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:44:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>