https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400674 Where the drawer admits the cheque signature, the cheque is treated as an inchoate instrument and the statutory presumption of liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act remains unless rebutted by evidence. A plea that the cheque was filled by another person, or that expert examination of ink age is needed, is insufficient by itself to displace that presumption. The refusal to allow expert examination did not extinguish the accused's right to adduce defence evidence to rebut the presumption, and interference with that order was not warranted. The challenge therefore failed, while the accused remained free to contest liability at trial by appropriate evidence. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400674 Where the drawer admits the cheque signature, the cheque is treated as an inchoate instrument and the statutory presumption of liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act remains unless rebutted by evidence. A plea that the cheque was filled by another person, or that expert examination of ink age is needed, is insufficient by itself to displace that presumption. The refusal to allow expert examination did not extinguish the accused's right to adduce defence evidence to rebut the presumption, and interference with that order was not warranted. The challenge therefore failed, while the accused remained free to contest liability at trial by appropriate evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400674