https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400670 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be used to weigh evidence or resolve disputed facts at the pre-trial stage. Where a complaint alleges cheque issuance, dishonour, service of notice, and non-payment, and the complainant's Section 200 Cr.P.C. statement supports initiation, the complaint discloses the basic factual foundation and prima facie ingredients of the offence. A merits-based challenge or denial of allegations does not justify quashing when the complaint on its face contains the essential averments. On that basis, interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was declined and the request to quash was rejected. en-us Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:56:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400670 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be used to weigh evidence or resolve disputed facts at the pre-trial stage. Where a complaint alleges cheque issuance, dishonour, service of notice, and non-payment, and the complainant's Section 200 Cr.P.C. statement supports initiation, the complaint discloses the basic factual foundation and prima facie ingredients of the offence. A merits-based challenge or denial of allegations does not justify quashing when the complaint on its face contains the essential averments. On that basis, interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was declined and the request to quash was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400670