<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1818 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted permission for the withdrawal of the Company Petition under Rule 82 of NCLT Rules, 2016, following a settlement agreement between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 1. Despite initial procedural lapses, the Tribunal emphasized the parties&#039; right to withdraw the petition, considering the settlement and the absence of any further claims. Respondent No. 5&#039;s objections were deemed irrelevant, and the Tribunal concluded that allowing withdrawal would effectively end the litigation. Consequently, the Company Petition was dismissed, all pending Interlocutory Applications were withdrawn, interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 06:51:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1818 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted permission for the withdrawal of the Company Petition under Rule 82 of NCLT Rules, 2016, following a settlement agreement between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 1. Despite initial procedural lapses, the Tribunal emphasized the parties&#039; right to withdraw the petition, considering the settlement and the absence of any further claims. Respondent No. 5&#039;s objections were deemed irrelevant, and the Tribunal concluded that allowing withdrawal would effectively end the litigation. Consequently, the Company Petition was dismissed, all pending Interlocutory Applications were withdrawn, interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>