<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1390 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under section 147 was unjustified as all material facts were disclosed during the original assessment. Additionally, the assessee was entitled to the rebate under section 88E in the computation of tax liability under section 115JB. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the CIT(A) and Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 06:51:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1390 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under section 147 was unjustified as all material facts were disclosed during the original assessment. Additionally, the assessee was entitled to the rebate under section 88E in the computation of tax liability under section 115JB. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the CIT(A) and Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>