<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1085 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291490</link>
    <description>The court made both Company Petitions absolute, approving the scheme of amalgamation between the two companies despite potential violations of Sections 295 and 297 of the Companies Act. Shareholders unanimously approved the scheme, and concerns over the validity of resolutions by the board of directors were addressed. The court directed the lodgment of the order and scheme for stamp duty adjudication, with costs allocated to the parties involved. The court emphasized that scheme approval does not absolve liability for violations and instructed relevant authorities to act upon the authenticated order copy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1085 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291490</link>
      <description>The court made both Company Petitions absolute, approving the scheme of amalgamation between the two companies despite potential violations of Sections 295 and 297 of the Companies Act. Shareholders unanimously approved the scheme, and concerns over the validity of resolutions by the board of directors were addressed. The court directed the lodgment of the order and scheme for stamp duty adjudication, with costs allocated to the parties involved. The court emphasized that scheme approval does not absolve liability for violations and instructed relevant authorities to act upon the authenticated order copy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>