<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 412 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400657</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the assessee&#039;s illness. The addition of an unexplained deposit in the ICICI Bank account was deleted as the assessee provided evidence of cash receipts. The addition of funds transferred through demand drafts was also deleted as the ITAT found the assessee had sufficient balance. However, the disallowance of expenses due to lack of supporting documentation was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 412 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400657</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the assessee&#039;s illness. The addition of an unexplained deposit in the ICICI Bank account was deleted as the assessee provided evidence of cash receipts. The addition of funds transferred through demand drafts was also deleted as the ITAT found the assessee had sufficient balance. However, the disallowance of expenses due to lack of supporting documentation was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>