<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 407 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400652</link>
    <description>Stamp duty and mortgage charges incurred to obtain business borrowing were treated as revenue expenditure because they were incidental to securing borrowed funds, not to acquiring an asset or enduring advantage. The purpose of the loan was held to be irrelevant where the expense was connected with obtaining the loan itself, so the disallowance was unsustainable and the expenditure was allowable in computing business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 09:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 407 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400652</link>
      <description>Stamp duty and mortgage charges incurred to obtain business borrowing were treated as revenue expenditure because they were incidental to securing borrowed funds, not to acquiring an asset or enduring advantage. The purpose of the loan was held to be irrelevant where the expense was connected with obtaining the loan itself, so the disallowance was unsustainable and the expenditure was allowable in computing business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>