<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 400 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings and order, upholding the charitable nature of the activities and emphasizing the need for new material in reassessment. The Tribunal highlighted the principle of consistency in tax exemptions and cited legal precedents to support its decision. The order was delayed beyond 90 days due to the COVID-19 lockdown, aligning with judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:13:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 400 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings and order, upholding the charitable nature of the activities and emphasizing the need for new material in reassessment. The Tribunal highlighted the principle of consistency in tax exemptions and cited legal precedents to support its decision. The order was delayed beyond 90 days due to the COVID-19 lockdown, aligning with judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>