<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 398 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400643</link>
    <description>The Court issued notices to the respondents, who accepted the same, and directed that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner until further orders, considering the circumstances and a previous order granting a stay. Respondents were given time to file their counter affidavits, with provision for a rejoinder affidavit if necessary, and the matter was scheduled for a hearing in January 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 398 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400643</link>
      <description>The Court issued notices to the respondents, who accepted the same, and directed that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner until further orders, considering the circumstances and a previous order granting a stay. Respondents were given time to file their counter affidavits, with provision for a rejoinder affidavit if necessary, and the matter was scheduled for a hearing in January 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>