<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 1020 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291485</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the second respondent to suspend all coercive proceedings under the Revenue Recovery Act against the petitioner pending the final decision on the appeal challenging the penalty order. The Court emphasized that the appeal was already scheduled for a hearing and instructed the second respondent to consider the appeal in accordance with the law. The Writ Petition was disposed of with this directive to ensure a fair hearing process for the petitioner during the pendency of the statutory appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:17:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 1020 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291485</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the second respondent to suspend all coercive proceedings under the Revenue Recovery Act against the petitioner pending the final decision on the appeal challenging the penalty order. The Court emphasized that the appeal was already scheduled for a hearing and instructed the second respondent to consider the appeal in accordance with the law. The Writ Petition was disposed of with this directive to ensure a fair hearing process for the petitioner during the pendency of the statutory appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>