https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291467 The tribunal dismissed the applicant's allegations and requests, finding them baseless. It emphasized that the Resolution Professional and the Committee of Creditors conducted the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) lawfully. The tribunal ruled that the applicant lacked standing to interfere in the process, leading to the dismissal of both IA No. 98/2019 and IA No. 222/2019 without costs. en-us Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:45:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291467 The tribunal dismissed the applicant's allegations and requests, finding them baseless. It emphasized that the Resolution Professional and the Committee of Creditors conducted the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) lawfully. The tribunal ruled that the applicant lacked standing to interfere in the process, leading to the dismissal of both IA No. 98/2019 and IA No. 222/2019 without costs. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291467