<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1362 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291481</link>
    <description>The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Hyderabad upheld a decision regarding the revocation of a Customs Broker&#039;s license, forfeiture of security, and penalty imposition under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal acknowledged subletting of the license but found inconsistencies in the evidence. It imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000, restored the license, and set aside the forfeiture of the security deposit. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating the punishment was proportionate and correctly exercised jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:45:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1362 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291481</link>
      <description>The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Hyderabad upheld a decision regarding the revocation of a Customs Broker&#039;s license, forfeiture of security, and penalty imposition under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal acknowledged subletting of the license but found inconsistencies in the evidence. It imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000, restored the license, and set aside the forfeiture of the security deposit. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating the punishment was proportionate and correctly exercised jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>