<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2790 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s findings, determining that the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) is the most appropriate method for establishing the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of international transactions. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment and the assessee&#039;s cross objections, emphasizing the importance of accurate adjustments and comparability in transfer pricing analysis. This decision favored TNMM over the internal Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method due to significant differences in the transactions compared by the Transfer Pricing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:44:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2790 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s findings, determining that the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) is the most appropriate method for establishing the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of international transactions. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment and the assessee&#039;s cross objections, emphasizing the importance of accurate adjustments and comparability in transfer pricing analysis. This decision favored TNMM over the internal Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method due to significant differences in the transactions compared by the Transfer Pricing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>