https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291460 Probation under Section 4 of the U.P. First Offenders Probation Act was held unavailable where the conviction included Section 307 IPC, so the probation order could not stand. The sentencing order was set aside, but the High Court did not impose sentence directly in revision because that would prejudice the accused persons' right to challenge a fresh sentence. The matter was therefore remanded to the trial court to pass a suitable sentence under Sections 307 and 324 IPC, preserving the appellate remedy against the new sentence. en-us Fri, 27 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291460 Probation under Section 4 of the U.P. First Offenders Probation Act was held unavailable where the conviction included Section 307 IPC, so the probation order could not stand. The sentencing order was set aside, but the High Court did not impose sentence directly in revision because that would prejudice the accused persons' right to challenge a fresh sentence. The matter was therefore remanded to the trial court to pass a suitable sentence under Sections 307 and 324 IPC, preserving the appellate remedy against the new sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291460