<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1930 (7) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF SIND</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291457</link>
    <description>Reference jurisdiction may extend to a legal challenge against refusal to register a partnership firm where the assessment proceeded on the footing that the firm was unregistered, so the issue could arise in the appeal against assessment even without a separate appeal on registration. The text also states that a partnership deed may qualify as an instrument of partnership for registration purposes even if signed only by the working partners, provided it is a formal written embodiment of the agreement, specifies the partners&#039; shares, and satisfies the prescribed registration requirements. The refusal to register solely for lack of signatures from all partners is described as unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1930 (7) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF SIND</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291457</link>
      <description>Reference jurisdiction may extend to a legal challenge against refusal to register a partnership firm where the assessment proceeded on the footing that the firm was unregistered, so the issue could arise in the appeal against assessment even without a separate appeal on registration. The text also states that a partnership deed may qualify as an instrument of partnership for registration purposes even if signed only by the working partners, provided it is a formal written embodiment of the agreement, specifies the partners&#039; shares, and satisfies the prescribed registration requirements. The refusal to register solely for lack of signatures from all partners is described as unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>