<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 374 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the CIT under Section 263, holding that the ITSC had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter from the date of the application. The Tribunal also found that the CIT&#039;s order was passed without adequate opportunity for hearing and during the COVID-19 lockdown, making it unsustainable in law. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the other aspects were kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 374 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the CIT under Section 263, holding that the ITSC had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter from the date of the application. The Tribunal also found that the CIT&#039;s order was passed without adequate opportunity for hearing and during the COVID-19 lockdown, making it unsustainable in law. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the other aspects were kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>