<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 365 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400610</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, removing the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) and the interest component under Section 14A. It upheld the administrative expenditure disallowance and the disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) for delayed PF and ESIC contributions. Additionally, the ITAT determined that disallowance under Section 14A should not impact book profit computation under Section 115JB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 365 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400610</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, removing the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) and the interest component under Section 14A. It upheld the administrative expenditure disallowance and the disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) for delayed PF and ESIC contributions. Additionally, the ITAT determined that disallowance under Section 14A should not impact book profit computation under Section 115JB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>