<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 347 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400592</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling against the appellant and in favor of the revenue. The judgment extensively analyzed the provisions of Section 115JB, the treatment of interest waiver, and the assessment of provisions made for meeting liabilities, ultimately upholding the decisions of the lower authorities based on a thorough evaluation of the facts and legal principles involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 347 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400592</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling against the appellant and in favor of the revenue. The judgment extensively analyzed the provisions of Section 115JB, the treatment of interest waiver, and the assessment of provisions made for meeting liabilities, ultimately upholding the decisions of the lower authorities based on a thorough evaluation of the facts and legal principles involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>