<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 341 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, overturning the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal found the omission of capital gain to be inadvertent and not indicative of deliberate concealment, considering the circumstances of the transaction and the absence of tax impact on the assessed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:56:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 341 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, overturning the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal found the omission of capital gain to be inadvertent and not indicative of deliberate concealment, considering the circumstances of the transaction and the absence of tax impact on the assessed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>