<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1514 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291433</link>
    <description>Seniority in the Assistant Commercial Tax Officer cadre was confined to appointments made against substantive cadre vacancies in accordance with the governing rules. Temporary appointments to posts created outside the cadre did not confer a right to claim inter-se seniority over regularly appointed officers. The Court held that a seniority list prepared to implement an earlier Supreme Court ruling could not be reopened by invoking General Rule 35(aa), because the underlying controversy had already attained finality and could not be re-agitated on a fresh theory. The seniority list was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:02:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1514 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291433</link>
      <description>Seniority in the Assistant Commercial Tax Officer cadre was confined to appointments made against substantive cadre vacancies in accordance with the governing rules. Temporary appointments to posts created outside the cadre did not confer a right to claim inter-se seniority over regularly appointed officers. The Court held that a seniority list prepared to implement an earlier Supreme Court ruling could not be reopened by invoking General Rule 35(aa), because the underlying controversy had already attained finality and could not be re-agitated on a fresh theory. The seniority list was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>