<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1316 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291437</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, due to a breach of natural justice principles as the petitioner was not properly served notices for personal hearings. The court directed the petitioner to attend a new hearing before the adjudicating authority, emphasizing procedural fairness. The decision did not delve into the merits of the case but focused on ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:02:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1316 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291437</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, due to a breach of natural justice principles as the petitioner was not properly served notices for personal hearings. The court directed the petitioner to attend a new hearing before the adjudicating authority, emphasizing procedural fairness. The decision did not delve into the merits of the case but focused on ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>