https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291428 In contempt proceedings, the Supreme Court directed the alleged contemnor and opposite parties to publish a fresh seniority list in terms of the earlier directions. The petitioners undertook to withdraw the similar writ petition pending before the High Court, while the contempt petition was kept pending for six weeks. Appearance was dispensed with for the present, and the applicants seeking impleadment were permitted to intervene rather than be added as parties. en-us Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291428 In contempt proceedings, the Supreme Court directed the alleged contemnor and opposite parties to publish a fresh seniority list in terms of the earlier directions. The petitioners undertook to withdraw the similar writ petition pending before the High Court, while the contempt petition was kept pending for six weeks. Appearance was dispensed with for the present, and the applicants seeking impleadment were permitted to intervene rather than be added as parties. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291428