<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 322 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400567</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner, a private limited company, to file representations with the new jurisdictional officer within six weeks for unblocking the Electronic Ledger under GST Rules. The officer was instructed to consider the representations promptly, ensuring a timeframe for resolution without delving into the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 322 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400567</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner, a private limited company, to file representations with the new jurisdictional officer within six weeks for unblocking the Electronic Ledger under GST Rules. The officer was instructed to consider the representations promptly, ensuring a timeframe for resolution without delving into the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>