<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 308 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400553</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the disallowed expenses and the Section 54B deduction claims, ensuring compliance with legal precedents and providing the appellant with adequate opportunity to present evidence. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering investments made within the extended period for filing returns under Section 139(4).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:10:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 308 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400553</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the disallowed expenses and the Section 54B deduction claims, ensuring compliance with legal precedents and providing the appellant with adequate opportunity to present evidence. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering investments made within the extended period for filing returns under Section 139(4).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>