<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 302 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400547</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of specific instances to justify ad-hoc disallowances of expenses without concrete evidence linking them to personal use. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of specific findings and justifications for such disallowances, citing legal precedents and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowances made in the previous case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:10:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 302 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400547</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of specific instances to justify ad-hoc disallowances of expenses without concrete evidence linking them to personal use. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of specific findings and justifications for such disallowances, citing legal precedents and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowances made in the previous case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>