<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 290 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400535</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench allowed the Application under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the restoration of a Company&#039;s name that was struck off under Section 248. The Tribunal considered the Company&#039;s evidence of ongoing business activities, financial challenges, and competitive industry dynamics. Restoration was granted with specific directions, including filing pending returns, depositing funds, and submitting compliance affidavits within a specified timeframe. The decision aimed to protect stakeholders&#039; interests and ensure statutory compliance, without automatically reinstating disqualified directors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 290 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400535</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench allowed the Application under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the restoration of a Company&#039;s name that was struck off under Section 248. The Tribunal considered the Company&#039;s evidence of ongoing business activities, financial challenges, and competitive industry dynamics. Restoration was granted with specific directions, including filing pending returns, depositing funds, and submitting compliance affidavits within a specified timeframe. The decision aimed to protect stakeholders&#039; interests and ensure statutory compliance, without automatically reinstating disqualified directors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>