<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1360 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291427</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the department&#039;s appeal, annulling the writ petitioner&#039;s confiscation of eleven gold biscuits and consequent penalty. Despite the petitioner&#039;s claims of purchase from a specific supplier, discrepancies in weight and lack of transaction records post-March 1993 led to disbelief in the defense. The Court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s failure to prove the gold&#039;s origin satisfactorily, leading to adverse inferences. Judicial review upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings as not clearly erroneous. An alternative argument under Section 125 of the Customs Act was disregarded. The Court set aside the previous judgment, reinstated the Tribunal&#039;s order, and directed legal action against the petitioner, who was also ordered to pay costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:00:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1360 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291427</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the department&#039;s appeal, annulling the writ petitioner&#039;s confiscation of eleven gold biscuits and consequent penalty. Despite the petitioner&#039;s claims of purchase from a specific supplier, discrepancies in weight and lack of transaction records post-March 1993 led to disbelief in the defense. The Court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s failure to prove the gold&#039;s origin satisfactorily, leading to adverse inferences. Judicial review upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings as not clearly erroneous. An alternative argument under Section 125 of the Customs Act was disregarded. The Court set aside the previous judgment, reinstated the Tribunal&#039;s order, and directed legal action against the petitioner, who was also ordered to pay costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>