<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1314 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291419</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed all three appeals, modifying the additions made by lower authorities for AYs 2008-09, 2010-11, and 2011-12. The profit element in transactions was estimated at 2% of alleged bogus purchases, considering the business nature and thin profit margins. The reassessment proceedings were upheld due to non-existent entities from which purchases were made, leading to sustained additions to account for the profit element.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 18:45:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1314 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291419</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed all three appeals, modifying the additions made by lower authorities for AYs 2008-09, 2010-11, and 2011-12. The profit element in transactions was estimated at 2% of alleged bogus purchases, considering the business nature and thin profit margins. The reassessment proceedings were upheld due to non-existent entities from which purchases were made, leading to sustained additions to account for the profit element.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>