<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1826 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of leave encashment and sponsorship expenses, while allowing limited relief under Section 14A. Several issues were remitted back to the AO for further verification, particularly concerning the applicability of the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) and the commercial expediency of certain expenditures. The claim for interest on interest was dismissed based on Supreme Court precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:11:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1826 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of leave encashment and sponsorship expenses, while allowing limited relief under Section 14A. Several issues were remitted back to the AO for further verification, particularly concerning the applicability of the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) and the commercial expediency of certain expenditures. The claim for interest on interest was dismissed based on Supreme Court precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>