<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1878 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291408</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction under the Wakf Act, 1995 depends on whether the Act requires the Tribunal to decide the dispute. Where the wakf character of the property is specifically disputed, Sections 6, 7, 83 and 85 indicate exclusive Tribunal jurisdiction and exclude the civil court. By contrast, a possession or injunction claim against a lessee or occupant, without a dispute on wakf title, was not within the Tribunal&#039;s pre-2013 jurisdiction unless the Act specifically provided for that relief. The 2013 amendment later expanded Section 83 to cover eviction and lessor-lessee rights, but that enlargement did not apply to earlier suits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1878 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291408</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction under the Wakf Act, 1995 depends on whether the Act requires the Tribunal to decide the dispute. Where the wakf character of the property is specifically disputed, Sections 6, 7, 83 and 85 indicate exclusive Tribunal jurisdiction and exclude the civil court. By contrast, a possession or injunction claim against a lessee or occupant, without a dispute on wakf title, was not within the Tribunal&#039;s pre-2013 jurisdiction unless the Act specifically provided for that relief. The 2013 amendment later expanded Section 83 to cover eviction and lessor-lessee rights, but that enlargement did not apply to earlier suits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>