https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400497 The court remanded the case back to a different officer with unlimited jurisdiction to decide the matter afresh, based on the value of goods and services covered by the authorization. The court emphasized the need for broad compliance with principles of natural justice due to the pandemic situation and set a deadline for the decision to be made by the end of December 2020. The court clarified that all allegations in the writ petition were deemed to have not been admitted by the respondents and disposed of the case along with the relevant application. en-us Mon, 21 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Nov 2020 13:45:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400497 The court remanded the case back to a different officer with unlimited jurisdiction to decide the matter afresh, based on the value of goods and services covered by the authorization. The court emphasized the need for broad compliance with principles of natural justice due to the pandemic situation and set a deadline for the decision to be made by the end of December 2020. The court clarified that all allegations in the writ petition were deemed to have not been admitted by the respondents and disposed of the case along with the relevant application. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 21 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400497