<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 250 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the restoration of a strike-off company&#039;s name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company failed to file statutory returns, leading to non-compliance with the Act and an assessment order by the Income Tax Department. The Tribunal directed the Registrar to revive the company&#039;s name for recovery purposes, imposing penalties for non-compliance. The revival was limited to recovering dues, with no obligation to file annual returns. The company was warned that other violations were not absolved, and compliance with further proceedings under Section 248 was required after recovering dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 13:45:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 250 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the restoration of a strike-off company&#039;s name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company failed to file statutory returns, leading to non-compliance with the Act and an assessment order by the Income Tax Department. The Tribunal directed the Registrar to revive the company&#039;s name for recovery purposes, imposing penalties for non-compliance. The revival was limited to recovering dues, with no obligation to file annual returns. The company was warned that other violations were not absolved, and compliance with further proceedings under Section 248 was required after recovering dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>